How can you believe life on Earth wasn't the work of an intelligent squirrel?

because it was obviously the work of an intelligent chipmunk.





=\How can you believe life on Earth wasn't the work of an intelligent squirrel?
The assertion fails under modal logic, for one thing.


Richard Dawkins tried, unsuccessfully, to use that same argument against a group of Christian philosophers. He could not refute the ontological argument, but his attempt to use the ontological argument to 'proove' an absurdity was quickly refuted with modal logic.How can you believe life on Earth wasn't the work of an intelligent squirrel?
Actually, I could believe that. I could believe a squirrel like you created it... smart, but a little dizzy.
Because squirrels produce only squirrels.





It's called science - observation.





Did you ever see a half man half ape?





Only in junk science.
Perhaps the aspect of god is sciuridiform.
A squirrel. Come on. You really believe that?
Hmmmm, good question. We are, afterall, alittle nuts. :-)
There is evidence of your squirreliness all around. There are none so blind as they who will not see.
Because in your picture you are laying there dead...did you take the wrong pill?


The Skeptical Christian


Grace and Peace


Peg
Well if it was.... praise be to the most high squirrel... but it wasnt so... thanks be to the most high, true and only living God.
We can't be sure although it sounds a little nutty
Because I can't believe it was intelligent.
Life is fairly complicated so I would venture to guess it was an intelligent porcupine.
Cars.





And all those little squirrels I see ';sleeping'; on the road.

back blackheads